
I have been fond of The Atlantic for years. I consider it a slightly left of center publication that does a fantastic job writing complex articles that are based on valid research and expert analysis. Then I came across this article in the most recent edition of The Atlantic. This opinion piece published under the subheading of IDEAS was written by Ben Appel.
Ben Appel is a New York based writer who is best known for his gender-critical memoir, Cis White Gay: The Making of a Gender Heretic. Ben Appel is a gay man and a noted transphobe. Appel is a vocal participant in many anti-trans forums from Genspect, a SPLC-designated hate group, to his gender-critical podcast of 2024, Informed Dissent. Based on information provided by Transgender Map written and curated by Andrea James, Appel seems to think that his more feminine traits during his childhood would in today’s circumstances cause the medical community to force him to transition. Appel has stated, “I, like a lot of other LGB (and some trans) people, believe that many children and some adolescents presenting at gender clinics today would likely desist and grow up to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual if they were given proper emotional support. In other words, in many cases, the medicalization of “trans kids” might actually be the medicalization of homosexuality.”
Thus, we have a known transphobe, gender-critical, gay man writing about his dislike of transgender ideas and the need for transgender erasure in one of the most academically rigorous magazines for the general population. How are we as transgender individuals supposed to take this article.
First, I would hope, that his article does not reflect the feelings of The Atlantic in general but just the opinions and beliefs of the writer. I also hope that The Atlantic published this article is some vain belief that they were covering both sides of a debate. However, when an argument is made about transgender people receiving medical care or their beliefs about their identities without talking to any transgender people, physicians, psychologists, or even referencing peer-reviewed literature, the unbalanced approach of this article in The Atlantic is more telling. Major professional organizations like the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society have all issued statements supporting gender-affirming care for minors and adults. Ben Appel opinion exaggerates a scenario that research sourced from these institutions suggests is relatively uncommon. Gay kids, fem boys, and masc girls are not forced or coerced into transitioning. There are so many gatekeepers (psychologists, physicians, and clinics themselves) to receiving transgender care, children and youth are more often pressured to not transition or to wait to transition until they have already passed puberty.
The evidence that no one would force Ben Appel to transition if he were a child today is the recent statistics on people who detransition. If children and young adults were routinely forced to transition, we would expect a high number of people detransitioning later in life. However, recent studies from Advocates for Trans Equality and other large meta-studies put detransition rates at approximately 1%. In addition, many of those who did detransition did so because of family or social pressure. Thus, the entire basis of this article is proved false. Ben Appel, doesn’t allow that just like sexuality, gender is not a choice. Appel, a gay man, would surely agree that sexuality is not a choice, but would vehemently deny that gender is not a choice, either. Appel doesn’t seem to understand that if he, as a child, still thought of himself as a boy, no one would force him to change his gender.
In the end, I can emotionally understand one man’s bigotry against trans individuals. What I can’t understand is how The Atlantic Magazine’s allowed Ben Appel to frame trans issues. Appel’s article and the publication of this article reinforce conflict framing of transgender people and transgender issues. I would suggest that all trans people are tired of magazines, journals, politicians, etc. treating trans people as a legal controversy, a political issue that must be solved, or a culture war debate with transgender individuals as the pawns of these games. Transgender people are seen not as people living lives but as a problem for society to argue about. This article reinforces the constant argument about trans existence. Do transgender people have the right to exist in society or not? This most recent article by The Atlantic would suggest: no.



































